According to studies, discrimination causes a direct effect on victim’s behavior. Moreover, different types of discrimination have a direct impact on a particular group, and an additional effect on other groups. For example, racial discrimination affects people suffered from ethnic discrimination, leading to depression and anxiety Abercrombie and the Class Action Racial Discrimination Suit. Type. Essay. Level. College. Discipline. Business law. Format. MLA. Sources. 2. Global Mindset. A global mindset is the ability to demonstrate openness towards other people, cultures, and different ways of doing things in general. A global mindset is very important when it comes to Nov 22, · Once the Fair Housing Act became law in , there was some question about how to implement it and enforce it. George Romney, the former Republican Governor of Michigan and newly-appointed Secretary of HUD, was a true believer in the need to make the Fair Housing Law a powerful one — a robust attempt to change the course of the nation's racial segregation
Academic Essay Writing Service Focused on Law and Finance - blogger.com
What is prohibited conduct? Setting up a panel and monitoring obligations. The key behaviours of investigators. Scoping and planning the investigation. Collecting the evidence. Conclusions and preparing an investigation report, essay racial discrimination.
Investigations in their context. Making findings, essay racial discrimination. The panel is tasked with making findings of fact and it is crucial that the panel concludes its investigation and its report with clear findings or a conclusion that the evidence did not permit the panel to make findings of fact, essay racial discrimination.
These conclusions must be based on the evidence the panel has found in essay racial discrimination course of its investigation: the documents, essay racial discrimination, the statements etc.
The investigation report must explain how the panel came to its findings. Assessing credibility. In some cases, the findings of fact will depend on the credibility of the witnesses. Here are some factors a panel may use to assess credibility:. Ultimately, the panel will make an assessment as to their credibility and therefore which account is credible.
Corroborative statements made by a complainant to others after an incident can be relevant. Assessing evidence.
When assessing the evidence, it is important for the panel to distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence. All this evidence is relevant, but not all evidence has the same weight. Hearsay evidence may be corroborative and is evidence of what a witness heard others say: Sergio told Donough that he saw Sane at a restaurant last Wednesday with a colleague.
Donough has no direct evidence of what Sane was doing last Wednesday; he can only give hearsay evidence of what Sergio told him. Hearsay evidence may be considered by a panel in the context of investigations of possible misconduct, but will have limited probative value on its own.
Drawing adverse inferences. Adverse inferences may be drawn from a failure to cooperate or an evasive response to questions. Standard of proof. Whether the evidence is sufficient to meet the requisite standard of proof at essay racial discrimination end of a disciplinary process is ultimately a decision of the Under-Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy and Compliance.
In cases where separation or dismissal is a possible outcome, the evidence must be clear and convincing, that is, the truth of the facts is highly probable. For any other disciplinary measure, the preponderance of the evidence is required more likely than not that the facts and circumstances underlying the misconduct exist or have occurred. Instead, essay racial discrimination, the panel must ensure that it explains the evidence that it relies upon in making its findings of fact.
Reaching conclusions and disagreement among panel members. The panel must submit a report as the final product of the investigation. The report is based on the evidence gathered during the investigation.
Disagreement amongst panel members can occur and can even persist until the end of the investigation. If the panel cannot eliminate disagreement through discussions, the disagreement should be reflected in the findings and conclusions. The disagreement may also be documented in more detail in a separate note-to-file. Drafting the report. The report is an official UN document and may essay racial discrimination part of a subsequent internal process. It should, therefore, essay racial discrimination, be:.
Essay racial discrimination tips:. The exact structure of the report is for each panel to determine but every report should ensure:. The report should neither raise unanswered questions nor leave matters open to interpretation, essay racial discrimination.
A suggested structure would be to:. Once the report is completed. The investigation report and case file should be submitted to the responsible official. The panel must make sure to keep a record of the reasons that delay the investigation.
The panel members should remain available to explain the investigation procedure and findings of fact, provide clarifications and additional fact-finding where necessary, and possibly provide testimony in any legal process that may follow. The panel should not communicate the outcome of the investigation, or the investigation findings, to the alleged offender or affected individual. The appropriate communication will take place at a later stage depending on what action is taken on the basis of the evidence contained in the investigation report.
Useful Templates. Skip to main content. Setting up a panel and monitoring obligations The key behaviours of investigators Scoping and planning the investigation Collecting the evidence Conclusions and preparing an investigation report Investigations in their context FAQs Templates Key documents Acronym list.
Assessing credibility In some cases, the findings of fact will depend on the credibility of the witnesses. Here are some factors a panel may use to essay racial discrimination credibility: any internal inconsistencies or inconsistencies with other statements made by the witness, taking account of whether the inconsistencies are on a material point whether the facts proffered as true by the witness are supported by the evidence, in particular any documentary evidence.
Consideration can also be given to the inherent probability of the account i. does the account require the panel to assume facts that are unlikely the demeanour of the witness however remain mindful that an inability to recollect may not indicate lack of truthfulness, in contrast to a deliberate attempt to avoid answering direct questions, answering without any clarity, responding with evasiveness, or lack of responsiveness.
Assessing evidence When assessing the evidence, it is important for the panel to distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence. Direct evidence is, as it suggests, direct. If I saw Fatima shout at and insult Adrian, that is direct evidence of the fact that Fatima insulted Adrian. Circumstantial evidence is evidence that supports a fact.
If Maria saw Adrian run and cry immediately after his meeting with Fatima, that is circumstantial evidence which may support a conclusion that Fatima did shout at and insult Adrian. In this case, this evidence is corroborative evidence of the central allegation.
Drawing adverse inferences Adverse inferences may be drawn from a failure to cooperate or an evasive response to questions. Standard of proof Whether the evidence is sufficient to meet the requisite standard essay racial discrimination proof at the end of a disciplinary process is ultimately a decision of the Under-Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy and Compliance.
Reaching conclusions and disagreement among panel members The panel must submit a report as the final product of the investigation. Drafting the report The report is an official UN document and may become part of a subsequent internal process, essay racial discrimination. It should, therefore, essay racial discrimination Factually correct Impartial and objective Concise, clear and complete Logically organized Top tips: Write in short and direct sentences Write in the active voice e.
This means each factual statement is based on a piece of evidence referenced usually in footnotes. It contains consideration of any exculpatory evidence discovered during the investigation. A suggested structure essay racial discrimination be to: First outline the terms of reference this helps focus the report: what exactly was being investigated Set out the rules, norms relevant to the investigation e.
the prescribed definition of essay racial discrimination Then succinctly explain the steps taken to gather evidence who was interviewed when, what documents were obtained etc. Once the report is completed The investigation essay racial discrimination and case file should be submitted to the responsible official. Useful Templates Template 5.
Making findings The panel is tasked with making findings essay racial discrimination fact and it is crucial that the panel concludes its investigation and its report with clear findings or a conclusion that the evidence did not permit the panel to make findings of fact.
Ip Man 4: How to Write Racism - Video Essay
, time: 15:27How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis Essay: Ultimate Guide
Abercrombie and the Class Action Racial Discrimination Suit. Type. Essay. Level. College. Discipline. Business law. Format. MLA. Sources. 2. Global Mindset. A global mindset is the ability to demonstrate openness towards other people, cultures, and different ways of doing things in general. A global mindset is very important when it comes to v Abstract For the past 25 years, the structure of academic research papers has been examined by linguists. In the present study, the functions of references in discussion and conclusion Oct 13, · Langston Hughes was a leader of the Harlem Renaissance of the s. He was educated at Columbia University and Lincoln University. While a student at Lincoln, he published his first book of poetry, The Weary Blues (), as well as his landmark essay, seen by many as a cornerstone document articulation of the Harlem renaissance, “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain.”
No comments:
Post a Comment